[Campaign] Superconsciousness Fwd: SANITY REIGNS: Architects, engineers present the facts of 9/11

[Love For Life Campaign]

Mike
We have more than a dozen excellent 9/11 videos in our website, that 
focus on the wide range of explosions reported by hundreds/thousands of 
people. All these explosions were mainly coming from around the basement 
and up to the 60th floors. A few explosions were reported as high as the 
70th/78th floors. How do you explain these explosions occurring before 
and after the two planes/missiles hit these buildings with ALL 
explosions reported on floors, well below where the planes/missiles hit? 
That's right, there is now heaps of evidence revealing missiles. 
Oh...... no way, our private corporation US government could not do 
this....... but yes.......a few Arabs could pull this off and time it 
perfectly when Norad was off line and be able to fly these huge jets. 
How convenient.

Find yourself at least half a day Mike and watch these videos 
http://www.loveforlife.com.au/video_dvd.

After hundreds of hours spent researching 9/11 since early 2002 and with 
the mountains of solid evidence at hand 
http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/86, I can say without any doubt 
whatsoever that NO Arabs were involved with the planning of 9/11, with 
the hijacking of all 9/11 planes, with the flying of any 9/11 planes and 
with the overall manning of the operation as it was happening.

Whatever evidence that might have been found with the WTC demolition 
operations centre, was destroyed when WTC 7 was demolished by 
explosives. In your way of thinking Mike, WTC 7, a 40+ story building 
was ONLY wired up with explosives, to PULL IT, during the day of 9/11 
but only after the planes hit WTC1 & WTC2 because there would be no 
other reason to pull it. Are you 100% sure that this would have happened 
while all the mayhem was going on next door?

How did the BBC and Mayor Rudolph Giuliani know that WTC7 was collapsing 
at least 20 minutes before it happened?

What about all those WTC7 workers/rescue workers warning heaps of people 
to get out of the way because WTC7 was about to collapse? Please explain 
Mike?

Since Sept 11 2001, The FBI, even until today have never listed Osama 
Bin Laden as a suspect with 9/11. When asked, the FBI says they have no 
evidence. If you don't believe me, Ring the FBI yourself or check their 
website. What goes on here Mike?

Then we have your Patriots Act, an 800+ page document that suddenly 
appears out of nowhere and is brought into action almost overnight after 
Sept 11 2001. How did this happen? Who prepared it? Who in your 
government knew about it before 9/11? Could the staff of George Bush 
create this 800+ document from scratch within 48 hours of 9/11 and have 
it passed through congress? Besides the loss of freedom forced upon most 
American citizens, have any private corporation/multi/transnational 
private corporations been effected in any way by the Patriots Act?
If you say yes, show me the evidence.

Who benefited long-term from 9/11, The US citizens? The Australian 
citizens? The Canadian Citizens? The New Zealand citizens? The British 
Citizens? The European citizens? The Asian citizens? The Middle Eastern 
citizens? or private corporation/multi/transnational private 
corporations?  Who benefited Mike?

Then you have one of George Bush Junior's favourite bonking partners 
Condoleezza Rice saying in Nov/Dec 2001 that her government has lots of 
unarguable evidence tying Arabs/Al Qaeda with 9/11 and later on the same 
statement was made with Iraq and WMD. Where is this evidence 
Condoleezza? We are all still waiting 5 to 6 years later?

Oh its just a coincidence that George Bush Junior's brother was in 
control of the overall security operations of WTC1 and WTC2. Oh that's 
just a coincidence. And what about the various days when the two 
buildings were shut down during 2001, prior 9/11. Are you aware of this? 
Are you also aware that ONLY private corporations are/were involved with 
the day to day operations of WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7. No good old American 
public servants were/are involved.

Are you also aware of the use of remote control/wireless detonations of 
buildings these days that do not require miles of interlinking wires to 
set of all the explosives?

There are numerous other facts which I could state but I do not want to 
spoil the important exercise that your brain requires if you work your 
way through all the 9/11 video's and articles in our website.

You are one of the moderators for over 500 Superconsciousness members 
Mike and you often have a caustic tongue with those you wish to attack. 
In your last reply to Fiona and I, you called us liars. We now ask you 
to prove to Fiona and I and all members of Superconsciousness that we 
are liars. Show us the unarguable evidence that you have that we are 
liars. If you can't, then you are to be seen as the liar, a 70+ year old 
arrogant ex-policeman who only talks around things for the sake of 
attacking ones character without ever addressing the facts, the logic, 
the evidence at hand.

Also, You are wrong Acharya in saying that Muslim/Arabs were involved 
with 9/11. Where is this unarguable evidence you have Acharya to back 
this up? If you don't have this unarguable evidence why are you accusing 
Muslims/Arabs?

Arthur Cristian

--------------------------------------------------

m c wrote:
Just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean they are not out to get you.

It looked that way, but the logistics of such a demolition would be 
impossible. In terms of tons, how much explosives would it require to 
drop a building the size of the twin towers? What would you attached 
them to that would be out of sight? Would you have to dig through the 
concrete to attach them to the beams? And nobody saw a thing?

Mike

------------------------------------------------

m c wrote: The problem is, you are doing the same thing with your

mumbo jumbo (that is: "unintelligible or
incomprehensible language or gibberish that engages
language or activity intended to confuse, complicate
or produce some obscure ritual."

What I perceive is that one indoctrination deserves
another. It's the pot calling the kettle black
syndrome. There is no prejudice quite so complete as
the one you convince yourself of. If one lies and
repeats the lie over time and if it goes unchallenged,
it tends to become truth to the teller.

Mike

----------------------------------------------------

acharya_s at yahoo.com wrote:

"Just [as] alcoholics or drug addicts must acknowledge that they have an 
addiction problem, we Muslims need to accept that there is a problem 
within our communities. Only when Muslims admit that 9/11 and 7/7 were 
the work of Muslim terrorists can we move forward to the next juncture: 
which is recognising the hard truth that Islam does permit the use of 
violence. Muslims who deny this, preferring instead to mouth easy 
platitudes about how Islam is nothing but a religion of peace, make the 
job easier for the radicals who can point to passages in the Koran, set 
down in black and white, that instruct on the killing of unbelievers.
Hallelujah! (Irony.)

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner 
at http://lists.altnews.com.au/MailScanner.html ,
and is believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.loveforlife.com.au/pipermail/campaign/attachments/20070723/d276e328/attachment.html>